Regulatory Science Symposium: Clinical Trials Hurdles Session 5 - Clinical Trial Data Disposition, Results, and Transparency Group (2015)

In this series, we will discuss how to successfully support and manage clinical trials

Regulatory & Quality Sciences
Communication, Dissemination, & Teamwork
Nancy Pire-Smerkanich, DRSc, MS

Assistant Professor, USC Mann Dept. of Regulatory and Quality Sciences; Associate Director, Regulatory Knowledge and Support

Course Syllabus/Topics

Clinical trials results: data disposition and transparency

  • Data disposition--where does all the data go?
    • Newspapers/headlines
    • Press releases
    • Clinical study report (CSR)
    • Abstracts/manuscripts
    • Registries such as www.clinicialtrials.gov
    • Submitting reports to regulatory authorities around the world such as IND, NDA/MAA
  • Develop press release
    • Good - positive results and action plan and gain founding
    • Bad - negative results and individuals may stop using those medicines
    • Two audiences ie. investors, lawyers, other businesses, search engines
  • Author clinical study report
    • A standard available for producing a report: ICH E3- structure and content of clinical study
    • De facto standard
    • Most transferable
    • Globally accepted and easy to use
    • Flexible for phase I studies
    • CSRs consists of the following:
      • Protocol element
      • Patients disposition
      • Data disposition
      • Statistics output
  • Publications
    • Abstracts
    • Manuscripts not critical in industry and they will develop marketing materials later on
  • Sharing results with sites/subjects
    • Press release
    • Tell those who are in the study how it went so no one is unaware
    • We do not have a good process for this, but putting into clinicaltrials.gov might assist with this objective
    • Sites are responsible to tell the subjects what the results are
  • Submitting reports to regulatory authorities
    • US IND
    • National health authority of other countries (if required)
    • As part of marketing application (NDA/MAA)
  • When do we submit study results/reports?
    • During development
      • Of an investigational new drug or clinical trial application (IND or CTA)
        • To support other clinical investigations
        • With IND annual reports
        • Informational amendments
        • Fulfill post-marking agreements- PMR/PMC
  • Data repositories
    • Exist all around the world
    • Government sponsored
      • Clinicaltrials.gov
        • Transparency initiative
        • Basic uses - identify trials of potential interest for specific individual, track process of specific trial, identify ongoing and terminated/completed trials, identify investigators/research members for certain studies
      • National Institute of Health clinical data repository (NIH CDR)
        • Includes all clinical electronic data from 1975 to present
        • Updated daily and publicly funded
    • Industry/company sponsored (new)
      • Mandatory reporting
      • Voluntary participation
        • Principle for responsible clinical trial data sharing
        • Includes data from approved and non-approved drugs
    • Public-private partnership
      • Database for the aggregate analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT)
      • Issue: No idea where the data is aggregated from, questioning the quality of the data
    • Industry/company sponsored
      • PhRMA and EfPIA
      • Biopharma companies are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing, yet also not violating the patient privacy, integrity of regulatory systems, and maintaining incentives for investment in biomedical research
      • Look for trends to lobby around
    • Clinical trial data sharing is relatively new
      • Must vet investigators etc.
    • Background in the US
      • Suppression of research results led to safety issues and prevent innovation
    • Reasons to register clinical trials and report results
      • Human subject protections
      • Research integrity
      • Evidence based medicine
      • Allocation of resources
    • History of ClinicalTrials.gov
      • FDAMA 113 (1997): mandates registry
      • Launched site in Feb. 2000
      • FDAAA 801(2007): expands registry and adds results database
      • Still requires phases II-IV drug and device trials for all diseases
      • Requires result reporting (2008)
        • Basic results, expansion of results, FDA-approved trials
      • Added enforcement provisions
    • Clinicialtrials.gov
      • Report summary trials at trial completion for
        • Trials of devices
          • Small feasibility studies are exempt
        • Trials of drugs and biologics
          • Phase I investigations are exempt
    • Trial reporting:
      • Register study before first participant is enrolled
      • Keep entries up to date
      • Subject to FDAAA
    • Basic results reporting requirements
      • Submission within 12 months of the earlier of estimated/actual primary completion date
      • Can postpone results due to marketing but will have to post them eventually
    • Uses of ClinicalTrials.gov 
      • Audience: volunteers, finding a new drug, finding a center of research for a given condition/intervention

Ackowledgement

Accompanying text created by Annie Ly | Undergraduate Research Associate and Provost's First Generation Research Fellow | lyannie@usc.edu