Regulatory Science Symposium: Clinical Trials Hurdles Session 5 - Clinical Trial Data Disposition, Results, and Transparency Group (2015)

In this series, we will discuss how to successfully support and manage clinical trials

Regulatory & Quality Sciences
Communication, Dissemination, & Teamwork
Nancy Pire-Smerkanich, DRSc, MS

Assistant Professor, USC Mann Dept. of Regulatory and Quality Sciences; Associate Director, Regulatory Knowledge and Support

Course Syllabus/Topics

Clinical trials results: data disposition and transparency

  • Data disposition--where does all the data go?
    • Newspapers/headlines
    • Press releases
    • Clinical study report (CSR)
    • Abstracts/manuscripts
    • Registries such as www.clinicialtrials.gov
    • Submitting reports to regulatory authorities around the world such as IND, NDA/MAA
  • Develop press release
    • Good - positive results and action plan and gain founding
    • Bad - negative results and individuals may stop using those medicines
    • Two audiences ie. investors, lawyers, other businesses, search engines
  • Author clinical study report
    • A standard available for producing a report: ICH E3- structure and content of clinical study
    • De facto standard
    • Most transferable
    • Globally accepted and easy to use
    • Flexible for phase I studies
    • CSRs consists of the following:
      • Protocol element
      • Patients disposition
      • Data disposition
      • Statistics output
  • Publications
    • Abstracts
    • Manuscripts not critical in industry and they will develop marketing materials later on
  • Sharing results with sites/subjects
    • Press release
    • Tell those who are in the study how it went so no one is unaware
    • We do not have a good process for this, but putting into clinicaltrials.gov might assist with this objective
    • Sites are responsible to tell the subjects what the results are
  • Submitting reports to regulatory authorities
    • US IND
    • National health authority of other countries (if required)
    • As part of marketing application (NDA/MAA)
  • When do we submit study results/reports?
    • During development
      • Of an investigational new drug or clinical trial application (IND or CTA)
        • To support other clinical investigations
        • With IND annual reports
        • Informational amendments
        • Fulfill post-marking agreements- PMR/PMC
  • Data repositories
    • Exist all around the world
    • Government sponsored
      • Clinicaltrials.gov
        • Transparency initiative
        • Basic uses - identify trials of potential interest for specific individual, track process of specific trial, identify ongoing and terminated/completed trials, identify investigators/research members for certain studies
      • National Institute of Health clinical data repository (NIH CDR)
        • Includes all clinical electronic data from 1975 to present
        • Updated daily and publicly funded
    • Industry/company sponsored (new)
      • Mandatory reporting
      • Voluntary participation
        • Principle for responsible clinical trial data sharing
        • Includes data from approved and non-approved drugs
    • Public-private partnership
      • Database for the aggregate analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT)
      • Issue: No idea where the data is aggregated from, questioning the quality of the data
    • Industry/company sponsored
      • PhRMA and EfPIA
      • Biopharma companies are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing, yet also not violating the patient privacy, integrity of regulatory systems, and maintaining incentives for investment in biomedical research
      • Look for trends to lobby around
    • Clinical trial data sharing is relatively new
      • Must vet investigators etc.
    • Background in the US
      • Suppression of research results led to safety issues and prevent innovation
    • Reasons to register clinical trials and report results
      • Human subject protections
      • Research integrity
      • Evidence based medicine
      • Allocation of resources
    • History of ClinicalTrials.gov
      • FDAMA 113 (1997): mandates registry
      • Launched site in Feb. 2000
      • FDAAA 801(2007): expands registry and adds results database
      • Still requires phases II-IV drug and device trials for all diseases
      • Requires result reporting (2008)
        • Basic results, expansion of results, FDA-approved trials
      • Added enforcement provisions
    • Clinicialtrials.gov
      • Report summary trials at trial completion for
        • Trials of devices
          • Small feasibility studies are exempt
        • Trials of drugs and biologics
          • Phase I investigations are exempt
    • Trial reporting:
      • Register study before first participant is enrolled
      • Keep entries up to date
      • Subject to FDAAA
    • Basic results reporting requirements
      • Submission within 12 months of the earlier of estimated/actual primary completion date
      • Can postpone results due to marketing but will have to post them eventually
    • Uses of ClinicalTrials.gov 
      • Audience: volunteers, finding a new drug, finding a center of research for a given condition/intervention

Ackowledgement

Accompanying text created by Annie Ly | Undergraduate Research Associate and Provost's First Generation Research Fellow | lyannie@usc.edu

NIH Funding Acknowledgment: Important - All publications resulting from the utilization of SC CTSI resources are required to credit the SC CTSI grant by including the NIH funding acknowledgment and must comply with the NIH Public Access Policy.