Regulatory Science Symposium: Clinical Trials Hurdles Session 1 and 2 - Challenges of Clinical Trial Management (2015)

In this series, we will discuss how to successfully support and manage clinical trials.

Regulatory & Quality Sciences
Study & Site Management
Research & Study Conduct

Course Syllabus/Topics

April W. Armstrong, MD MPH:

  • Phases of clinical investigative research study:
    • Protocol development
    • Review to activation
    • Study conduct
    • Reporting dissemination
  • Challenges in conducting investigator-initiated research:
    • Identify available clinical research support resources
    • Maintain a qualified and on-demand study coordinator
    • Access expertise in recruiting, budgeting and biostatistics
  • Clinical Research Support (CRS): The single stop access to all available services for the investigator to develop, activate, conduct and report results for clinical trials. The focus is mainly on the investigator-initiated studies and non-cancer trials.
  • CRS group services available for the efficiency of the investigation: 
    • Protocol development and study planning:
      • Research navigation
      • Clinical research informatics
      • Biostatistics and study design
      • Recruitment support
      • Budgeting
      • Technology transfer
    • Review to activation
      • Feasibility review
      • Scientific review
      • IRB review, study registration
    • Study conduct
      • Recruitment
      • Study coordinator pool, Clinical Trial Unit (CTU), clinical trial and data management systems
      • Coordination of ancillary services like radiology, laboratory and pharmacy
      • Study monitoring and closure

Deena Bernstein, MHS:

  • Hurdles in clinical trials
    • Feasibility
    • Protocol complexity
    • Patient recruitment
    • Staff turnover
    • Site sustainability
  • Feasibility elements
    • Protocol review
    • All site stakeholders
    • Enrollment acceptance
    • Protocol procedure
    • Available vendors
    • Patient population
    • Protocol review
  • Feasibility tools
    • Protocol
    • Logistics
    • Routine care vs. study related
    • Identify challenges
    • Outsourced sub-contractors
    • Accountability

A manager should create a process for your site, engage the study team, learn from the process, often revise feasibility assessment, include historical enrolment metrics, review reliable patient populations and, not be afraid to decline a study.

  • Protocol complexity
    • Regulatory pressure
    • Sub studies tied to main protocol
    • Patient safety
    • Extended out of screening periods
    • Optional biomarkers and labs/tissue sampling

In order to control complexity, mangers should have patient focus groups, site focus groups, PI input to protocol design, and protocol simulation (mock trials).

  • Site enrollment ratios
    • Exceed target: 13%
    • Meet target: 39>#/span###
    • Under target: 37%;
    • Fail to enroll a single patient: 11>#/span###
  • Patient recruitment factors
    • Not meeting criteria
    • Awareness
    • Public perception
    • Advertising yield
    • Protocol requirement
  • Staff turnover
    • Employment tactics
    • On-boarding
    • Training
    • CRC work load
    • Competitive geographic area
    • Engaging staff
    • Career path
    • Incentives

To solve staff turnover problems, team building activities can be used to encourage staff engagement

  • Site sustainability
    • Cash flow – 90 days
    • Monthly payment terms
    • Opportunities in US increasing
    • Consider uncompensated activities
      • RBM/monitoring
      • Lab processing
      • Work effort

Acknowledgement

Accompanying text created by Annie Xie | Undergraduate Research Associate | Provost's Undergraduate Research Fellow and SC-CTSI Student Worker| anniexie@usc.edu