Digital Scholar Webinar: Disseminating scientific research via Twitter: Practical insights and research evidence

About one-fifth of current scientific papers are being shared on Twitter. With nearly 69 million active U.S. Twitter users (24% of the U.S. adult population) and 328 million monthly active users worldwide, Twitter is one of the biggest social networks worldwide. Understandably, hopes are high that tweets mentioning scientific articles and research findings can reach peers and the general public. Studies show that most of the engagement with scientific papers on Twitter takes place among members of academia and thus reflects visibility within the scientific community rather than impact on society. However, there are ways to reach the broader public. This webinar will provide an overview of using Twitter to reach peers and non-specialist groups, the relationship between tweets and citations, and provide tips for building an academic Twitter presence.

Katja Reuter, PhD, Assistant Professor of Clinical Preventive Medicine at the Institute for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Research in the Department of Preventive Medicine at the Keck School of Medicine of USC; Director of Digital Innovation and Communication for the Southern California Clinical and Translational Research Institute (SC CTSI).

• Describe the strengths and limitations of using Twitter for the dissemination of scientific research.
• Describe practical approaches for building an academic presence on Twitter.
• Describe approaches to identify and reach different audiences on Twitter.

• Social Media Use in 2018. Web link: http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/
• Haustein S, Costas R, Larivière V (2015) Correction: Characterizing Social Media Metrics of Scholarly Papers: The Effect of Document Properties and Collaboration Patterns. PLOS ONE 10(5): e0127830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127830. Web link: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0120495
• Haustein S, Peters I, Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M, Larivière V. Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. Web link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1838
• Priem, J. and Costello, K. L. (2010), How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proc. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech., 47: 1–4. doi:10.1002/meet.14504701201. Web link: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/meet.14504701201/epdf
• Eysenbach G. Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact. Federer A, ed. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2011;13(4):e123. doi:10.2196/jmir.2012. Web link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278109/
• Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR (2013) Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services. PLoS ONE 8(5): e64841. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841. Web link: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0064841
• Shuai X, Pepe A, Bollen J (2012) How the Scientific Community Reacts to Newly Submitted Preprints: Article Downloads, Twitter Mentions, and Citations. PLoS ONE 7(11): e47523. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047523. Web link: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0047523
• Terras M. The Impact of Social Media on the Dissemination of Research: Results of an Experiment. Journal of Digital Humanities, September 2012. Web link: http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-3/the-impact-of-social-media-on-the-dissemination-of-research-by-melissa-terras/
• Thelwall et al. Tweeting Links to Academic Articles. Web link:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.385.6234
•  Friedrich et al. Do tweets to scientific articles contain positive or negative sentiments? Web link: http://altmetrics.org/altmetrics15/friedrich/