- Objectives
- NIH, FDA policies on inclusion and reporting by sex, race, ethnicity
- Rationale for inclusion and reporting by sex, race ethnicity
- Examples of heterogeneity of intervention effects by sex
- Implications for trial design and reporting
- NIH Policies on Inclusion
- Must provide justification if clinical trial does not include both women and men
- If prior research suggests that there might be differences for intervention effects by sex, race, ethnicity, then the trial should be designed to test efficacy within relevant subgroups
- FDA Policies
- Example of FDA Guidance: Collection of Race and Ethnicity Data in Clinical Trials
- Standardized and consistent collection and reporting of sex, race, and ethnicity data
- Be sure to include plans for retention and recruitment for specific subgroups
- Two-Question Format
- Question 1: Do you consider yourself Hispanic/Latino or not Hispanic/Latino?
- Question 2: Which of the following five racial designations best describes you? More than one choice is acceptable.
- NIH and FDA policies are recommendations, not mandates
- Rationale
- Incidence and survival of many diseases as well as drug effects vary by sex, race, and ethnicity
- Disparities are related to genetic differences, lifestyle, environment, and socioeconomic factors
- Clinical trial participation is historically highly education white men
- Inclusion of sub-groups needs to start with early phases of study
- Subgroup Reporting
- FDA demographic rule
- Population level PK studies
- Sex and Clinical Trials
- Studies were historically limited to men because women can become pregnant; hormonal fluctuations; and perceptions that certain illnesses are “male” diseases; women typically are smaller than men
- Sex vs. Gender in Clinical Trials
- Sex is biological vs. gender is socially constructed
- Clinical trials often use these terms interchangeably
- Sex and Gender in Clinical Trials
- Both factors influence how/what particular treatment a person selects, how they adhere to it, and how they metabolize a drug
- Ideally, trials should include equal numbers of men and women, because in cholesterol-lowering treatments, there were differences between the two groups
- Race (Mis)reporting and Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials
- Other Examples of Race/Ethnic Differences in Clinical Trials
- Race-focused trials showed that heart failure, kidney disease, and hypertension differ between black and white populations
- Implications for Trial Design and Analyses
- To address and understand health disparities, clinical trials must enroll enough participants in these subgroups to look for differences in efficacy, safety, and pathophysiology
- Reporting results by these sub-groups will assist in the analysis of data and identification of differences after the trials have ended
- Previous studies have recruited homogeneous groups to reduce statistical variability, but it is important to this also reduces the generalizability of research to other groups
- Groups that would be treated by this medical intervention should be the ones participating in the research studies
- Important to identify and respond to recruitment and retention
- Moving clinical trials out of institutions and into communities
- Having minority patients engage with professionals of similar backgrounds
- Multi-site trials
- Use of technology in clinical trial design
- Subgroup Statistical Analyses
- If a known gender/race/ethnicity effect of an intervention exists, then trial design must have sufficient sample size in order to conduct valid statistical analyses within each relevant group.
- If unknown, sufficient sample size in subgroups remain necessary to obtain reasonably precise estimates of effects
- Thank you!
Regulatory Science Virtual Symposium: “Make Informed Decisions: Key Statistical Principles to Clinical Trial Design” Session 6: Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in Clinical Trials (2022)
Research & Study Design
Communication, Dissemination, & Teamwork
Wendy Mack, PhD
Director, Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design
Course Syllabus/Topics
Acknowledgement
Accompanying text created by Annie Ly | RKS Project Administrator, SC-CTSI lyannie@usc.edu